Practice dialogues › Hindi › Legal
Cross-Examination of a Food Allergy Incident
Barrister (speaking English) and Plaintiff (speaking Hindi) talk through “Cross-Examination of a Food Allergy Incident”. You interpret both ways — English into Hindi, and Hindi into English — one segment at a time, exactly as in the CCL test.
Practise this dialogue with AI marking →Read it first if you like, then practise it cold: the recording plays one segment, you interpret, the next segment plays. Marking shows, segment by segment, what you kept, left out or changed.
Full transcript
Mrs Sharma, you told the court that on 14 March at the café you ordered the vegetable curry and specifically told the waiter about your severe peanut allergy. Is that correct?
जी हाँ, यह बिलकुल सही है। मैंने वेटर को साफ़ शब्दों में बताया था कि मुझे मूंगफली से गंभीर एलर्जी है।
But the restaurant's incident log for that evening shows no note of any allergy warning being given to staff. Can you explain this discrepancy?
मुझे नहीं पता कि रिकॉर्ड में यह दर्ज क्यों नहीं है, लेकिन मैंने वेटर को साफ़ तौर पर बताया था और उसने सिर हिलाकर स्वीकार भी किया था।
If you had not clearly mentioned your allergy beforehand, would you still have ordered that particular dish, given its listed ingredients on the menu?
नहीं, अगर मुझे यकीन नहीं होता कि उसमें मूंगफली नहीं है, तो मैं वह डिश कभी नहीं ऑर्डर करती।
Records show you were taken to Westmead Hospital by ambulance within 15 minutes of the reaction starting. Is that timeline accurate?
जी हाँ, यह समय सही है। मुझे बहुत तेज़ी से साँस लेने में तकलीफ़ होने लगी थी, इसलिए एम्बुलेंस को तुरंत बुलाया गया।
Did the medical report from Westmead Hospital confirm anaphylaxis specifically, or could your symptoms have been caused by something else entirely?
डॉक्टर की रिपोर्ट में साफ़ लिखा है कि यह एनाफिलैक्सिस ही था, किसी और कारण से नहीं।
One final question, Mrs Sharma: since that incident, have you carried an EpiPen at all times whenever you dine out?
जी हाँ, अब मैं हमेशा अपने साथ एपीपेन रखती हूँ, चाहे मैं कहीं भी खाना खाने जाऊं।
Practise it
Reading a transcript is not interpreting. The free daily dialogue on this site plays each segment at native speed, records you, and marks the information you transferred against the same categories examiners use — omissions, distortions, insertions — so you know where the marks went.
Start this dialogue →More Hindi dialogues
Same topic · Legal
How the test works
Practice dialogue written to the CCL specification (two speakers, segments of 35 words or fewer, about 300 words). It is a practice text, not a NAATI test paper, and the AI score is this site's estimate, not a NAATI result. All Hindi dialogues · All languages